Single and multiple winner systems
Currently, Vancouver uses plurality to elect one mayor and plurality at large to elect 10 councillors. In so much as I’d love to see a multiple-winner Condorcet method used to elect both sets, I understand that such algorithms are too difficult for most to follow in multiple winner scenarios. While I think STV is a reasonable compromise, I dislike how IRV ignores votes and misrepresents large demographics when electing a single representative.
| Winners | Plurality | IRV/STV | Condorcet |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single | Trivial to implement, but horrible results | Simple to implement, but poor results | Understandable method with good results |
| Multiple | Simple to implement, but poor results | Understandable method with good results | Good results, but too complex for most to understand |
It’s unreasonable to suggest that we should use one method for single winner elections (Condorcet for the mayor) and another for multiple winner elections (STV for the councillors); I think that idea just wouldn’t sell. That being said, maybe IRV/STV is a imperfect, but reasonable stepping stone.
I’m not fully convinced yet, but I think small increments towards fairer representation is more realistic than giant leaps towards awesome.