<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Trends in fairness and complexity</title> <atom:link href="http://cognitivesandbox.com/posts/trends-in-fairness-and-complexity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://cognitivesandbox.com/posts/trends-in-fairness-and-complexity/</link> <description>Vegan cooking, unix tidbits and other minor discoveries</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 20:32:34 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator> <item><title>By: Brad Beattie</title><link>http://cognitivesandbox.com/posts/trends-in-fairness-and-complexity/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link> <dc:creator>Brad Beattie</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 01:01:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cognitivesandbox.com/?p=1833#comment-169</guid> <description>I definitely have my systems I prefer over STV (at the moment it&#039;s &lt;a href=&quot;http://elections.cognitivesandbox.com/#ignored&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Ranked Pairs using ratings ballots&lt;/a&gt;), but I&#039;m on board with anything that moves us along that historical trend towards fairer systems.
I&#039;m thinking lately that smaller steps are in order, by which I mean instituting electoral reform at municipal levels. BC-STV recently failed with only 39% support, but Vancouver was 47% for it, Victoria 59%. I&#039;m preparing a presentation for &lt;a href=&quot;http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/mayorcouncil/speaktocouncil.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Vancouver&#039;s city council&lt;/a&gt;. Maybe that&#039;s the next step. *shrug*</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely have my systems I prefer over STV (at the moment it&#8217;s <a
href="http://elections.cognitivesandbox.com/#ignored" rel="nofollow">Ranked Pairs using ratings ballots</a>), but I&#8217;m on board with anything that moves us along that historical trend towards fairer systems.</p><p>I&#8217;m thinking lately that smaller steps are in order, by which I mean instituting electoral reform at municipal levels. BC-STV recently failed with only 39% support, but Vancouver was 47% for it, Victoria 59%. I&#8217;m preparing a presentation for <a
href="http://vancouver.ca/ctyclerk/mayorcouncil/speaktocouncil.htm" rel="nofollow">Vancouver&#8217;s city council</a>. Maybe that&#8217;s the next step. *shrug*</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Ratel</title><link>http://cognitivesandbox.com/posts/trends-in-fairness-and-complexity/comment-page-1/#comment-168</link> <dc:creator>Ratel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:36:52 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.cognitivesandbox.com/?p=1833#comment-168</guid> <description>Great description, I drew out something similar once but never followed it through.  I wish more people would see electoral reform this way. There are some people who are attached to particular systems and aren&#039;t willing to settle for improvements that aren&#039;t perfect.  We all need to recognize there is no such thing as a perfect democratic system and that the goal is progress towards more fairness, not some particular implementation of PR or any other type of reform.
thanks.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great description, I drew out something similar once but never followed it through.  I wish more people would see electoral reform this way. There are some people who are attached to particular systems and aren&#8217;t willing to settle for improvements that aren&#8217;t perfect.  We all need to recognize there is no such thing as a perfect democratic system and that the goal is progress towards more fairness, not some particular implementation of PR or any other type of reform.</p><p>thanks.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
